The cell-theory; a restatement, history and critique.
نویسنده
چکیده
In the first half of the nineteenth century it was commonly supposed that new cells arose either exogenously, outside pre-existing cells, or endogenously, from small rudiments that appeared within pre-existing cells and gradually grew larger. The theory of exogeny had been founded by Wolff (1759), and was supported especially by Link (1807), Schwann (1839), and Vogt (1842). The theory of endogeny, which had been hinted at by various writers in early times, obtained the backing of a very large literature. Its chief advocates were Raspail (1825, &c), Turpin (1827, &c), Schleiden (1838), Kolliker (1843-4), and Goodsir (1845). That cells do not arise exogenously or endogenously, but are produced by the division of pre-existing cells, was at last realized by the convergence of studies made in three separate fields, as follows: (1) Trembley (1746, &c), Morren (1830, 1836), Ehrenberg (1830, 1832, 1838), and others noticed how protists multiply. (2) Dumortier (1832), Mohl (1837), and Meyen (1838) watched the partitioning of the cells of filamentous algae, (3) Several observers studied the cleavage of eggs and at last revealed that this was a process of cell-division (Prevost and Dumas (1824), von Siebold (1837), Barry (1839), Reichert (1840), Bagge (1841), Bergmann (1841-2)).
منابع مشابه
Critique of Plays From Behind the Glasses in The Light of New Historicism, A review and critique of the play from Behind the Glasses: Tayyebeh Nasrollahi
From Behind the Glasses in The Light of New Historicism A review and critique of the play From Behind the Glasses Tayybeh Nasrollahi PhD student of Persian language and literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University [email protected] Abstract From the perspective of modern historicism, literature and history are influenced by the forces of cultural discourse and social action. New ...
متن کاملCritique of Research Book (Literature)/A Critique of Kimia of Rumi’s Haram, Sadaf Golmoradi
A Critique of Kimia of Rumi’s Haram Sadaf Golmoradi/ Professor at Tehran Farhangian University, [email protected] Abstract The present research is aimed at introducing and reviewing Kimia of Rumi’s Haram. Although the book does not mention in the title that it is in face a critique but we see that it is an essay based on "... the critique of novels Kimiakhatoon, Rumi’s Daughter, and the ...
متن کاملBoonin on the future-like-ours argument against abortion.
I argue that David Boonin has failed in his attempt to undermine Donald Marquis's future-like-ours argument against abortion. I show that the ethical principle advanced by Boonin in his critique to that argument is unable, contrary to what he claims, to account for the wrongness of infanticide. Then I argue that Boonin's critique misrepresents Marquis's argument. Although there is a way to rest...
متن کاملThe Cell - Theory : a Restatement , History , and Critique PART II
Cells have certain definable characters. These characters show that cells (a) are all of essentially the same nature and (b) are units of structure. THE essence of this proposition can most easily be grasped by considering what would be left of the cell-theory if it were omitted. We should then be in the same position as was Leeuwenhoek (1674), who, having found that a number of tissues consist...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Quarterly journal of microscopical science
دوره 89 Pt 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1948